Legal Opinion

People v. Forrest

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1990No. E006479PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty before a magistrate (Pen. Code, § 859a) to two counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), admitted the allegations that, in connection with each robbery, defendant used a dangerous weapon (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd.(b)), admitted the truth of two alleged prior serious felony convictions (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (a)) and admitted that he had served a prior prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)).1 After defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was denied, the trial court sentenced defendant to state prison…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. BreckenridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. GreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API