Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Maneval

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1966No. 8563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Charlton Anderson has recovered the sum of $12,000.00 for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall from his truck while he was on defendant’s premises as a business visitor. The defendant has appealed, principally on the ground that plaintiff made no submissible case. The nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries are not in dispute. At the time in question, the defendant operated a grain and feed supply business in Jasper, Missouri, and it is conceded that the premises upon which the casualty occurred were under his control. It is also conceded that, at least…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Knox v. Pioneer Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Devine v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Millar v. BergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Plumlee v. Ramsay Dry Goods CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Uder v. Missouri Farmers Ass'n, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Manufacturers' Metals & Chemicals, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API