Hanford Gas & Power Co. v. City of Hanford
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to recover from the city of Hanford, $740.20, paid by plaintiff to said city under such circumstances as, it is claimed, entitles plaintiff to recover it with interest, and also to obtain a decree enjoining the city from doing certain things. A demurrer to the complaint for want of facts to state a cause of action was overruled, and defendant failing to answer, judgment was given for the recovery of such money with interest, and restraining the city from the commission of any of the acts alleged to be threatened. Defendant appeals from such judgment.
The complaint is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Phelan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Maxwell v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lewis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Rooney v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Hartford v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Nashville Gas & Heating Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Kozasa v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.