Legal Opinion
City of Hartford v. Connecticut Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
We make correction of the finding as to a part of paragraph twenty-three and strike out a part of paragraph twenty-nine. These changes in the finding appear in the statement of facts preceding the opinion. Other corrections asked for are denied.
The defendant street railway’s predecessor was operating upward of nine miles of horse railway and nearly two of overhead trolley, in the city of Hartford, when it petitioned the city for permission to operate upward of eleven miles of additional overhead trolley over other of the streets of the city. Permission was given by the so-called Tucker grant…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charlton Press, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Colaluca v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- In re Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Community Credit Union, Inc. v. ConnorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.