Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State of Hawaii

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 10, 1994No. Civ. 93-00309 DAEPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.

The court heard the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on March 7, 1994. Burt Snyder, Esq., and David Onsager, Esq., appeared on behalf of plaintiff; David Webber, Esq., appeared on behalf of defendants. In this case, the plaintiff challenges the requirement of the State of Hawaii, Board of Professional Engineers, Architects, Surveyors, and Landscape Architects, that surveyors have a working knowledge of certain Hawaiian language terms used in…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Applications of Herrick and IrishHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Julian v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  3. Amro v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  4. Crownholm v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API