Legal Opinion
Amro v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 23, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-2257-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Joseph P. Amro, a senior engineer currently employed by The Boeing Company, brings suit for race, color and national origin discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (Title VII) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and disability discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 66) filed May 13, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that defendant’s motion should be sustained.
Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amro v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Goodwin v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Lucero v. Sandia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012