Legal Opinion
Julian v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1998No. Nos. 3:95-CV-1096 CFD, 3:95-CV-1097 CFDPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a motion for partial summary judgment in each of these consolidated actions. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The complaints in these actions were filed on June 12, 1995, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq.1 On November 30, 1995, the court issued a case management order in each case which adopted the pretrial deadlines…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Robert E. Kennedy, Jr. Joyce Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, William T. Hanton (85-3819), Frank Wszelaki (85-3827)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin Lau, Ho Sih Fong, Kau-Ying Lau, Ying Lup Lau, and Wai Yau ChiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- NAS Electronics, Inc. v. Transtech Electronics PTE Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- North Star Mutual Insurance v. Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.