Legal Opinion

Von Neindorff v. Schallock

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1937No. Civ. No. 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

—This is an action to quiet title. The first count of the complaint sets forth all of the facts relied upon as showing that all of the defendants are estopped from disputing the plaintiff’s title to the land in question. The second count is in the ordinary form of a quiet title action. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants Lamkin have appealed.

The real property involved in this action is a small piece or strip of land situated within the exterior boundaries of a 24%-acre orange grove, which was owned by the defendants Schallock. The legal title to this smaE piece…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Messer v. Hibernia Sav. Etc. SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City of San Francisco v. FuldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Konda v. LamkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Saner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API