State ex rel. Columbus Southern Power Co. v. Sheward
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
For a writ of prohibition to issue, the respondent must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of that power must be unauthorized by law, and refusal of the writ must result in injury for which no other adequate legal remedy exists. State, ex rel. Albright, v. Delaware Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 40, 572 N.E.2d 1387; State, ex rel. Lewis, v. Warren Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 249, 556 N.E.2d 1184.
The first and third prongs of this test have been established. By issuing the temporary restraining order, respondent Sheward…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Albright v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Herrick v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Bradford v. Trumbull County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Kalniz v. Ohio State Dental BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.