Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bradford v. Trumbull County Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-1000PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of prohibition to issue, the respondent must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of that power must be unauthorized by law, and refusal of the writ must result in injury for which no other adequate legal remedy exists. State ex rel. Columbus S. Power Co. v. Sheward (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 78, 79, 585 N.E.2d 380, 381.

I

Appellant argues in his first proposition of law that the county court does not have jurisdiction to hear his case. This argument is based on the power of the courts of common pleas to establish the jurisdiction of county courts.

R.C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Columbus Southern Power Co. v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Pearson v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. City of Middleburg Heights v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Sellers v. GerkenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. National City Commercial Capital Corp. v. AAAA At Your Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. West v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API