Legal Opinion
Greig v. MacY's Northeast, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 19, 1998No. Civil Action 95-1259 (MLP)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF NOVEMBER 10, 1997
WOLFSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the motion by pro se plaintiff, G. Jeanine Greig (“Greig”), to compel the disqualification and withdrawal of the law firm, Amdur, Boyle & Maggs (the “Am-dur firm”), and its attorneys from representing defendant, A. Kenneth Weiner, Esq. (“Weiner”). The court has reviewed the moving and opposition papers, and considers this matter pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted and, further, the Amdur firm is disqualified from continuing as legal counsel for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Cardona v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Atlantic City v. TruposSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Santacroce v. NeffDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Beilowitz v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.