Wise v. Wakefield
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County and from an order denying a new trial. C. L. Claflin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BEITT,
1. Plaintiffs sued to recover a balance of eight hundred and thirteen dollars and forty-two cents alleged to be due them upon a mutual and open account with defendant. They obtained a verdict and judgment for the sum of two hundred and eight dollars and six cents only; afterward, their motion for new trial was denied. They urge here that the verdict was not justified by the evidence; but the only specification of insufficiency in that respect contained in the statement on motion for new trial was this: “The evidence was insufficient for the jury to find that plaintiffs were only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nightingale v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Helbing v. Svea Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- McLaughlin v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp.California Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.