Johnson v. Roberts Bros.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The trial court allowed exceptions to the refusal of the court to give instructions requested and not given, and to the modification of such instructions made by the court. No other exception to the charge of the court was reserved by plaintiff.
The trouble with plaintiff’s case is that the. jury did not find in accordance with plaintiff’s testimony. The testimony in the case was conflicting, and it is not the province of the court to weigh the evidence and decide upon the conflict. There was testimony on the part of defendant tending to show that the defendant was not negligent and that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Wells v. Clark & Wilson Lbr. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Easton v. QuackenbushOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Lott v. De Luxe Cab Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Fassett v. BoswellOregon Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyons v. BrowningOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Bartholomew v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950