Legal Opinion

Wells v. Clark & Wilson Lbr. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

The main contention in this case inheres in the definition of the word “employment.” In other words, when was this plaintiff employed by the defendant? If her employment commenced with receiving the employment card from the employment agency in Portland, or if it commenced when she accepted transportation at Nehalem Junction, then she is subject to the Workmen’s Com pensation Act and her remedy for her injuries must be found in an application to the Industrial Accident Commission and not by an action for damages against the defendant company.

The theory of the defendant is that either when she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Southern Ry. v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Susznik v. Alger Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. AuslandOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Brewer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hendricks v. Portland Electric Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Platt v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Forrest v. TurlayOregon Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API