Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 3, 2001No. 00-0041PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

Defendant, Theodore Allen, appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting the delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. See Iowa Code § 124.401(l)(c)(3) (1997). His claim for reversal rests on application of the “procuring agent defense,” a theory recognized in State v. Lott, 255 N.W.2d 105 (Iowa 1977), but neither applied in that case nor in subsequent Iowa cases in which it has been raised. We conclude the widely discredited doctrine no longer retains vitality here or elsewhere. We therefore reject Allen’s attempt to rely on it and affirm his conviction.

I. Background…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. State v. LottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. United States v. Russell PruittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. State of Iowa v. Orlando David RodriguezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. State of Iowa v. James Alon ShorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. State v. SpatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. United States v. Kyle BoleynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API