People v. Roche
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fuchsberg, J.
Today this court reaffirms the established New York rule that one who acts solely as the agent of a purchaser of narcotics cannot be convicted of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance. Having thus determined that the abolition of that defense would be an unwarranted departure from the decisional law of this State, we must decide in the present case whether, under a reasonable view of the evidence adduced at trial, the jury should have been charged on that question.
The proof in this case, essentially undisputed, was garnered by an undercover…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. SierraNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. HerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. SierraNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. AndujasNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. EchevarriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.