Legal Opinion

Poluk v. J.N. Manson Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 29, 2002No. 02-0486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. J.N. Manson Agency, Inc., and General Insurance Company of America appeal a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding Manson liable to the Estate of Millie Fusfeld for negligence while acting as the Estate's insurance agent. Manson argues the trial court erred when it submitted the issue of Manson's negligence to the jury. The court determined Manson should have informed the Estate's agent about the vacancy clause and further clarified the coverage the Estate sought when the agent informed Manson the building was being sold and its tenant was leaving. Manson argues it had no duty to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Nelson v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sprangers v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Apodaca v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Olson v. Wis. Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  4. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. TOP HAT, INC. v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API