Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin Two Tracts, L.P.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided October 22, 2002No. 4:00CV373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL N. BROWN, District Judge.

On this day came on for consideration Motion of United States for Summary Judgment Renewed and Extended to Encompass Amended Counterclaim, and the Court having considered the motion, the memorandum of law in support of the motion, the Defendant’s response, and all pleadings filed with respect to the original motion for summary judgment filed by the United States, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action by the United States of America (“the Government”) to require the Defendant, Austin Two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Casey Enterprises, Inc. And D/B/A Pendley Hills Hardware and Minit Check Grocery, Fite H. Casey, Jr. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API