Bennett v. Bruchou
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
The plaintiff, Charles Bennett, instituted this suit against Jack Bruchou and others as ■defendants, to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on real property in Klamath Falls, Oregon. All the defendants defaulted except the one named. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, foreclosing the lien and ordering the property covered thereby sold, the •defendant Bruchou prosecutes this appeal.
Early in the month of July, 1931, Bruchou, who was the owner of a tract of land in Klamath Falls on which Fe was then operating a service station, decided to demolish the building on the property and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Goff v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Nicolai-Neppach Co. v. PooreOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Bernard v. HassanOregon Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Land Board v. BrownellOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Drake Lumber Co. v. LindquistOregon Supreme Court · 1946