Legal Opinion

Swartzberg v. Reserve Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1960No. 90PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

This is an action at law to recover benefits allegedly owing under the terms of an insurance policy. It is not a controversy without action, submitted upon an agreed statement of facts for the determination of a question in difference between the parties, as' authorized by G.S. 1-250. Dowling v. R. R., 194 N.C. 488, 140 S.E. 213; Briggs v. Developers, 191 N.C. 784, 133 S.E. 3.

Absent the stipulations, the action was for trial upon evidence pertinent to the issues raised by the pleadings. The crucial issues were raised by the allegations of defendant’s further answer and defense and plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Hinson v. United Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Willetts v. WillettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API