Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. Terhune
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHÁVEZ, Justice.
{1} This case involves a dispute between two adjoining landowners over an easement. In 2003, Respondent Amethyst Land Company (Amethyst) acquired a quitclaim deed to an undeveloped twenty-two-acre parcel (the 22-acre parcel) in the Santa Fe foothills. Amethyst promptly searched the county property record and incorporated all of the documents concerning the property into corrected deeds. One of the documents it found and incorporated in the corrected deeds was an Extinguishment Agreement purporting to terminate an easement on Tract 3 of adjoining property that benefitted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. Driver, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Norment v. TurleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Michelet v. ColeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. TerhuneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- McFarland Land and Cattle v. Caprock SolarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023