Legal Opinion

Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. Terhune

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2014No. Docket 34,083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} This case involves a dispute between two adjoining landowners over an easement. In 2003, Respondent Amethyst Land Company (Amethyst) acquired a quitclaim deed to an undeveloped twenty-two-acre parcel (the 22-acre parcel) in the Santa Fe foothills. Amethyst promptly searched the county property record and incorporated all of the documents concerning the property into corrected deeds. One of the documents it found and incorporated in the corrected deeds was an Extinguishment Agreement purporting to terminate an easement on Tract 3 of adjoining property that benefitted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Driver, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  2. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Norment v. TurleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Michelet v. ColeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. TerhuneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  2. McFarland Land and Cattle v. Caprock SolarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API