In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

*375 MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is direct action plaintiffs’ (“plaintiffs”) letter/motion to compel (“motion to compel”) testimony from a Rule 30(b)(6) witness for defendant Temple-Inland, Inc. (“Inland”).1 Plaintiffs initially sought an order compelling the deposition of an Inland corporate designee about: (1) Inland’s antitrust compliance policy; (2) Inland’s verbal communications with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in connection with an investigation into the linerboard2 *376industry; (3) the factual bases for Inland’s assertions in a “White paper” produced…