Legal Opinion
Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. v. Mandorico, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided June 12, 1998No. CIV. No. 97-1646(DRD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. ■ Deposition of Arthur L. Pressman, Dun-kin’ Donuts’ attorney
On February 6, 1998, defendant Mandori-eo, Inc., filed a motion to compel the deposition of Arthur L. Pressman and disqualify him as counsel for Dunkin’ Donuts, Incorporated.1 On February 23, 1998, Dunkin’ Donuts filed a response to defendant’s motion to compel the deposition and disqualification of their attorney.2 Plaintiff seeks a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to prevent defendant from deposing its attorney, Arthur L. Pressman.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United States v. HansenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Bassett v. Tempur Retail Stores, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- HAM IV REALTY, LLC v. USROOFCOATERS, INCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Karen Rain v. Connecticut General CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.