Legal Opinion

WM High Yield Fund v. O'Hanlon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 04-3423PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGROME D, DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs1 — six institutional Funds that invested in debt securities issued by Diagnostic Ventures, Inc. (DVI, Inc.)2 — sue for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. They also seek imposition of liability under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a); Section 18 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78r; and Pennsylvania’s common law of fraud.3 Jurisdiction is the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa; federal question, 28 U.S.C. § 1331; and supplemental over…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp. v. KRA Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In re Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. Shareholder LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Christopher K. Schrichte, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API