Legal Opinion
Michelsen v. Boeing Company
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 18, 1991No. 26491-5-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, C.J.
Kevin and Kathleen Michelsen appeal the order on summary judgment partially dismissing their suit against The Boeing Company (Boeing). The Michelsens sued Boeing for wrongful discharge and for Boeing's alleged violations of the medical restriction policy while Mr. Michel-sen was employed at Boeing. The discharge was based on his violation of the terms of the policy during his employment.
In August of 1986 Mr. Michelsen was injured while working as a painter at a Boeing plant. He was riding a bicycle from one end of the plant to the other carrying a 5-gallon can of paint thinner. While still on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-IWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Hiatt v. Walker Chevrolet Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.