Legal Opinion

Fell v. Spokane Transit Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1996No. 61385-1PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

911 P.2d 1319 (1996)

128 Wash.2d 618

Evelyn FELL; Jean Toews; Dianna Bailey; Don Howley; Hazel Proost; Richard Arundell; Paul Clements; Howard Bolton; and Coalition of the Responsibly Disabled, Respondents,

v.

SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

No. 61385-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 29, 1996.

Reconsideration Denied May 9, 1996.

Perkins Coie, Thomas F. Kingen, James P. McNeill, III, Spokane, for appellant.

Lonnie G. Davis, Seattle, Lawrence Weiser, Spokane, for respondents.

TALMADGE, Justice.

The Spokane Transit Authority (STA), a public transit agency,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-IWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Scrivener v. Clark CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API