Legal Opinion

James Graham Mfg. Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 6, 1950No. 28823PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff has fully performed two cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts with the United States (Navy Department), the first entered into on November 7, 1942, and the second on July 1, 1944. As work was performed under the contracts, plaintiff periodically submitted invoices containing statements of the costs incurred. Pursuant to the terms of the contracts, the Bureau of Supplies and Accounts of the Navy examined the invoices and determined that the cost items set forth were reimbursable to plaintiff. Among the cost items approved were those for charitable donations,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Penn Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  4. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. McShain Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  3. Leeds & Northrup Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Raydist Navigation Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1956
  5. American Chemical Society v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API