Leeds & Northrup Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GRIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Leeds & Northrup Company, has filed a complaint containing sixty-two claims against the United States for goods sold and delivered and demanding judgment in the amount of $23,603.53 with interest and costs. Defendant, United States of America, 'filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 -this court lacks jurisdiction of the action because it is 'based on a claim exceeding $10,000. By an order dated January 10, 1951, Judge Bard of this court denied the motion to dismiss for the reason that the separate claims alleged in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Penn Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
- Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raydist Navigation Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1956
- Sunroc Refrigeration Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.