Legal Opinion

McShain Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1936No. 43085PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhalev, Judge

The contract in this case provided that the contracting officer should ascertain the facts and the extent of the causes of delay and his findings of facts “shall be final and conclusive.” The contracting officer was the architect of the capitol and he did make a finding of fact that the contractor had been unavoidably delayed by unforeseen events beyond his control and without fault or negligence. The Comptroller General subsequently decided that the contractor was liable for 9% days’ delay and deducted liquidated damages in the sum of $1,662.50. Neither fraud nor bad faith is alleged or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Penn Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  5. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. C. J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. James Graham Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  3. Leeds & Northrup Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. General Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  5. John McShain, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API