Legal Opinion
Matyuf v. Phoenix Insurance
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County
Decided April 18, 1933No. 208PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brownson, P. J.,
This case was by agreement brought before the court for hearing without a jury, a stipulation having been filed agreeing upon the facts, the same to be taken as if found by special verdict; the following being the statement of the
Facts
“1. On May 7, 1932, the Phoenix Insurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut, issued to Frank T. Matyuf and Julia Matyuf a policy of insurance, insuring against loss by fire a certain building on the west side of and known as No. 4 Black Alley, Canons-burg, to an amount not exceeding Twenty-five Hundred ($2,500.00) Dollars. A correct copy of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burt v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Schultz v. Pacific InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Bellman v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. Germania Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fiorangelo Spezialetti and Lorraine Spezialetti, Husband and Wife, D/B/A Spezi's Lorraine Spezialetti v. Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Cooperative Fire Insurance Association of Vermont v. DominaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Taylor v. SeckingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Taylor v. SeckingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962