Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Seckinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1962No. Appeal, 166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The plaintiff in this equity case is appealing from an order of the court below in favor of the defendants.

Willa Mae Taylor, the plaintiff, and her husband, Paul Taylor, purchased, as tenants by entireties, premises at 122 Hobart Street, Philadelphia, in April 1951. At the same time, they gave a mortgage on the premises to Charles L. Seckinger and Anna M. Seckinger, his wife, the defendants, for $3950. They also paid for and delivered to the mortgagees a standard fire insurance policy insuring the building against loss by fire in the amount of $6000 and containing a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Jones v. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Miller & Dobrin, Etc., Co. v. CAMDEN FIRE, ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Bellman v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Knights of Joseph B. & L. Ass'n v. Mechanics' Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. ApodacaWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Giovannitti v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Risha v. Farmers Fire Insurance Agency, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County2001
  4. Lancaster Residential Investors v. North American Life Assurance Co. (In re Lancaster Residential Investors)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Public Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Societa Operaia Mutuo Soccorso, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API