Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 12, 1953No. C. D. 1509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This action involves the classification of merchandise described upon the invoices as greasewood extract sludge, and as greasewood extract, crude, imported from Mexico. Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The plaintiff claims that it is properly free of duty under the free-list paragraph 1686 as a natural resin, not specifically provided for, or, alternatively, that it is dutiable under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article.

At the trial,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. George Beurhaus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API