Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
JohnsoN, Judge:
These protests, consolidated at the trial, involve merchandise described as ficin powder or leche de o je en polvo, imported from Peru on various dates in 1949. The collector assessed duty thereon at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as nonenumerated manufactured articles. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as nonenumerated unmanu-factured articles, or at 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Maher-App & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Astoria Pan Americana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Astoria Pan Americana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Astoria Pan Americana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.