Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 7, 1955No. C. D. 1714Published

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

In this case, 11 protests covering 30 entries were, by stipulation of the parties, consolidated for trial. The merchandise here involved consists of certain material imported from Mexico, part of which was invoiced as greasewood extract or greasewood extract, crude, and the remainder as refined powdered greasewood extract or refined greasewood extract. That portion of the importation described as greasewood extract or greasewood extract, crude, was classified under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as nonenumerated manufactured articles and assessed with duty at 20 per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Aetna Explosives Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. United States v. Merck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API