Legal Opinion

Foster v. Preferred Accident Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1903No. 10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Taw. On motion by defendant for judgment on reserved point notwithstanding the verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This is a suit upon a policy of accident insurance taken out in August, 1900, by Charles S. Partridge, whereby the defendant promised, inter alia, to pay $2,500 to “Mrs. Mary G. Foster, friend,” if the insured should die as the result of an accident. Upon this policy the insured paid nine quarterly premiums, and died from accident on September 8, 1902. The defense is the beneficiary’s want of insurable interest, and upon that point the undisputed facts are as follows:

The insured was an attorney at law, and resided in Florida, where Mrs. Foster also had her…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Campbell v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Cheeves v. Anders, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Bloomington Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BlueIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. United Security Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. American Nat. Insurance v. MooreAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Burdette v. Columbus Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Federal Casualty Co. v. ChatmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API