Legal Opinion

Federal Casualty Co. v. Chatman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1918No. 9,629PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; Earl Sample, Judge. Action by Mollie M. Cbatman against tbe Federal Casualty Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an action instituted by appellee to recover death benefits under an accident policy issued to her husband, Eobert Chatman, by appellant company. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee, and from the judgment thereon this appeal is prosecuted. The assignment of errors contains three specifications: (1) That the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to make the amended complaint more specific; (2) that the court erred in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the amended complaint; and (3) that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The first and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Fox v. Masons' Fraternal Accident Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Milner v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. CummingsOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexiou v. Bridgeport-Peoples' Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Clow Corp. v. Ross Township School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API