Legal Opinion

Burdette v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action by Susan Burdette against the Columbus Mutual Life Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, President:

Of the two questions discussed, one only need be deter-, mined upon this review; that one being whether plaintiff on. June 30, 1913, had an interest in the life insured sufficient; to permit her as beneficiary to maintain this action on the, policy issued by the Columbus Life Insurance Company. Upon the trial the court, apparently adopting the view that, she had no such interest, on defendant’s motion excluded’ the testimony introduced by her and entered the nil capiat judgment of which she complains.

No relationship by consanguinity or affinity existed between Susan Burdette,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Opitz v. KarelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Union Fraternal League v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Kentucky Life & Acc. Ins. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  5. Hess' Admr. v. SegenfelterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Volunteer State Life Insurance Co. v. Pioneer BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  2. Schmidt, Admx. v. Prudential Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API