Legal Opinion
United States v. Kent Borden Rogers, United States of America v. Jacob N. Peilte
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1983No. 82-1286, 82-1287PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Kent B. Rogers and Jacob N. Peilte appeal convictions for substantive bankruptcy fraud and conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud. They allege the use of evidence based on immunized testimony, improper joinder in the indictment, prejudice caused by pre-indictment delay, and insufficient evidence to support their convictions. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case arises out of appellants’ activities in connection with the bankruptcy of Global Western Development Corporation (Global). Rogers was president and majority shareholder of Global and Peilte was his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. SerranoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James E. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.