Legal Opinion

United States v. Kurlander

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 11, 2014No. 2:11-cr-00315 (WHW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLS, Senior District Judge.

Gerry and Patricia Dale (“Relators”) move to intervene in the above-captioned criminal matter against defendants Mitchell Kurlander (“Kurlander”) and Alan Abeshaus (“Abeshaus”) (collectively, “Defendants”) under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(5), for the purpose of obtaining a relator’s share of the criminal fines, restitution and/or forfeiture paid by Defendants. Defendants and the Government oppose. Relators’ motion is denied.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following pertinent facts are taken from the parties’ briefs, Relator’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. James WegelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. John Patrick Couch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. KARUPAIYAN v. KNIPPER HEALTHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. Rushing v. LickDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API