Legal Opinion

United States v. John Patrick Couch, M.D.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 17, 2018No. 17-13402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge:

When a private person brings a False Claims Act suit-known as a qui tam action-the government may choose to intervene and take over the action. 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (b)(2). It may also choose to pursue "any alternate remedy available." Id. § 3730(c)(5). If it pursues an "alternate remedy," the False Claims Act gives the qui tam plaintiff the "same rights" in the "alternate" proceeding as she would have had if the qui tam action "had continued." Id. Presented here is the question of whether this statute allows a qui tam plaintiff to intervene in criminal forfeiture…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SW Gen., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James WegelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Bell v. CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  3. United States of America v. The Gardens Pharmacy, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
  4. United States v. Ling CuiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Santiago Alirio Gomez RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API