Legal Opinion

United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2001No. 99-55599PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge GOULD

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, private individuals may bring qui tam civil actions against entities that have defrauded the government. If an FCA suit is brought by a private individual (“relator”) as a qui tam action, the United States may choose to intervene. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2). Whether or not the government inter*1006venes, the relator is entitled to a share of any recovery in the action. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3730(b)(4), (d). If the government declines to intervene but instead…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States v. County of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  4. Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Rille v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API