United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge GOULD
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, private individuals may bring qui tam civil actions against entities that have defrauded the government. If an FCA suit is brought by a private individual (“relator”) as a qui tam action, the United States may choose to intervene. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2). Whether or not the government inter*1006venes, the relator is entitled to a share of any recovery in the action. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3730(b)(4), (d). If the government declines to intervene but instead…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Phelps v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. County of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Rille v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.