Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Julius

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1895No. 17,374PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellants to compel the satisfaction of a mortgage.

It is alleged in the complaint that one Cripe executed to the appellants a mortgage on certain real estate in Carroll county, Indiana, to secure a note dated April 28, 1893, payable one year after date; that afterward appellee *311purchased said real estate from Gripe, and the same was conveyed to him by deed; that as part of the purchase money thereof he assumed and agreed to pay said note for $220; that on the 27th day of April, 1894, he tendered said sum of $220 to appellants, being the amount then due and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
  2. Wilson v. VanceIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Roehner v. . Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bowen v. RatcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Trahant v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Promenade Towers Mutual Housing Corp. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Pedersen v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mathews Farmers Mutual Live Stock Insurance v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API