Legal Opinion

Promenade Towers Mutual Housing Corp. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 8, 1991No. 2 September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this case a debtor claims the right to prepay in full the debt incurred in a commercial transaction and secured by a deed of trust that is silent on prepayment. We shall apply the general rule, namely that, absent a statute or agreement permitting prepayment, the mortgagor has no right to prepay. But, before we reach that conclusion, we must address the debtor’s contention that the Maryland rule on mortgage prepayment is the opposite of the general rule. That contention requires us to divine the reasoning underlying the mandate in a 1794 decision of this Court that was…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Mahoney v. FurchesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Baybank Middlesex v. 1200 Beacon Properties, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Houston North Hospital Properties v. Telco Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Arthur v. BurkichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. StrnadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Rand & Reed Powers PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  4. Nationwide Insurance Companies v. RhodesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Tilghman Hardware, Inc. v. LarrimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API