United States v. Credit
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOK, Judge:
Contrary to appellant’s pleas, a general court-martial convicted him of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. We originally granted review to consider two issues:
I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED PREJUDICIALLY BY DENYING THE DEFENSE REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA OR DEPOSING OF SEVERAL WITNESSES WHO WERE MATERIAL AND NECESSARY TO THE DEFENSE OF THE CASE.
II. WHETHER THE RECORD OF TRIAL WAS AUTHENTICATED BY A PERSON WHO WAS AUTHORIZED TO DO SO.
We answered the second issue in the negative but did not address the first issue, and we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. CreditUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. HamptonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. DodgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. VietorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. TrueCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. HodgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.