Legal Opinion
In re Application of Buckeye Wind, L.L.C.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2012No. 2010-1554PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} This is the first time that we have reviewed an order involving the grant of authority to construct a proposed wind-powered electric generation facility. After full review of the record and consideration of the parties’ arguments, we hold that the order of the Power Siting Board should be affirmed because the board acted in accordance with all pertinent statutes and regulations.
I. Background
{¶2} The General Assembly enacted legislation, 2007 Am.Sub.S.B. No. 221, effective July 31, 2008, to require utilities to provide a portion of their electricity supply from alternative energy sources…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Application of Am. Transm. Sys., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.