Legal Opinion
Mehta v. Surles
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 29, 1990No. 767, Docket 89-7965PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Appellants Dinesh and Pravina Mehta own a house on 367 Old Army Road in the town of Greenburgh, New York. They bought the house in 1979. In 1988 their former next-door neighbors, the Kims, who resided at 371 Old Army Road, sold their house to appellee Futura House for use as a “community residence” to care for as many as ten mentally ill adults. According to the Mehtas’ affidavits, which we must accept as true on this review of a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees,2 the residence will function as a halfway house; some residents will live…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Jose LoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert T. Dale v. John BartelsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Puckett v. City of Glen CoveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Mehta v. SurlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rudolph v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Van-Go Transport Co. v. New York City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- All Aire Conditioning, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.