Legal Opinion
BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 2, 2000No. 3:98-cv-01657PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DKT. NO. 481]
HALL, District Judge.
On August 31, 2000, the court issued a ruling on motions for a permanent injunction [Dkt. No. 431] and for an award of punitive damages [Dkt. No. 433]. See Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 114 F.Supp.2d 59 (D.Conn.2000). 1 In that Ruling, the court ordered, inter alia, that, upon entry of judgment in this action, Microsoft will be permanently enjoined in accordance with an order providing:
1. It is hereby ORDERED that Microsoft, its directors, officers, agents and employees, are enjoined from publishing,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Horsehead Resource Development Co. v. B.U.S. Environmental Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Philbrick v. University of ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Metropolitan Entertainment Co., Inc. v. KoplikDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenwood Group, LLC v. Brooklands, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016