Plass v. Morgan
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered September 30,1903, dismissing a writ of garnishment, upon sustaining a demurrer to the controverting affidavit of the garnishee.
1Opinion of the Court
Dunbab, J. —
Appellant commenced this action to recover a judgment against the defendant, and in such action caused a writ of garnishment to be served on the respondent, who answered that he had no property or effects belonging to the defendant. The plaintiff contro- ‘ verted said answer by the following affidavit:
*161‘‘Charles EL Plass, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That he is not satisfied with the answer of the garnishee herein, and has good reason to believe and does believe that the answer of said garnishee is incorrect in this, that on the -- day of March, 1903, the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Everett Produce Co. v. Smith Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Mill & Logging Supply Co. v. West Tenino Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Michigan Packing Co. v. MessarisMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.