Rothchild Bros. v. Trewella
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered May 19, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action against the vendee of goods sold in fraud of creditors.
1Opinion of the Court
Rudkin, J. —
Between the 8th day of Bebruary, 1902, and the 13th day of September, 1902, one Kennedy was engaged in the retail liquor business, at the town of Hoquiam, in this state. During that period he became indebted to the plaintiff in this action in the sum of $407.05, on account of the purchase price of merchandise, to be used in the conduct of his business. On said 13th day of September, 1902, and while said Kennedy was so indebted to this plaintiff for such merchandise, he sold substantially his entire business and stock in trade, in bulk, to the defendant in this action. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newman v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Mill & Logging Supply Co. v. West Tenino Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Emmons-Hawkins Hardware Co. v. SizemoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Galbraith v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.