Legal Opinion
Barsema v. Susong
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1988No. CV-87-0031-PRPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
James and Debra Barsema (plaintiffs) petition us to review a decision of the court of appeals. We granted review to determine whether A.R.S. § 12-569 can be constitutionally applied to limit the cross-examination of an expert witness on issues pertaining to possible bias and prejudice. See Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTS
Plaintiffs brought a malpractice action against William Susong, M.D. (defendant). Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona (MICA) provided malpractice…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Slayton v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.